[Linux-Biella] compilazione moduli

CIARROCCHI Paolo linux@bilug.linux.it
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:54:29 +0100


From: Claudio [mailto:cmaffio@bilug.linux.it]

Ho letto ora questa mail su lkml:
-------------
List:     linux-kernel
Subject:  Re: [Q] Which kernel + special patches ???
From:     Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Date:     2002-11-28 16:46:28
[Download message RAW]

On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 03:24, Till Immanuel Patzschke wrote:

> following this list for quite a while now raised the above question.  To
get
> more specific:
> Given an SMP system with many thousand processes and a potentially high
network
> and IO load, what is the best combination of source and patch, to make
best use
> of SMP, keep load low and throughput high?

Personally, I use 2.4-ac which includes rmap, the O(1) scheduler, and a
couple performance tweaks like read-latency and irq balancing.

But I have seen some excellent numbers from 2.4-aa, so you may want to
try that out, especially now that Andrea has the O(1) scheduler in
there.  2.4-aa has a large collection of performance patches.  Andrew
Morton says that is the best performing 2.4 kernel he has seen.

Your best bet is 2.6 when it comes out :)

> Many thanks for the help and Happy Thanksgiving!

Same to you.

	Robert Love
--8<-----------------------

-aa sono quasi i kernel SuSe (andrea arcangeli)
-ac sono quasi i kernel RH  (Alan Cox)

Come vedete _nessuno_ riesce a dire questo kernel e' meglio di quest'altro
;-)

		Paolo

=================================
"STRICTLY PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

This message may contain confidential and proprietary material for the sole
use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact
the sender and delete all copies.
The contents of this message that do not relate to the official business of
our company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it."

=================================